King Charles III may ban Archie and Lilibet from being Prince and Princess

शेयर करें
एम्बेड करें
  • 20/09/2022 को प्रकाशित
  • King Charles III is considering banning Archie and Lilibet from using Prince and Princess in their title if Harry’s upcoming memoir and his Netflix documentary with wife Meghan Markle is controversial, an insider told Vanity Fair.

टिप्पणियाँ • 3 803

  • Kimmie S
    Kimmie S 9 दिन पहले +1910

    I think Harry and Megan made their own choice to leave their titles (and their children's) behind.

    • Beatriz
      Beatriz 7 दिन पहले +2

      If Charles wants to get the people's respect, he needs to remove all titles from the toxic duo. The Brits will love him and the rest of the world will respect him

    • Patricia Graham
      Patricia Graham 7 दिन पहले

      Yes. Simple really!

    • TL G.
      TL G. 7 दिन पहले +1

      @Mrs K That's what meghan says but we all know titles mean everything to her it's why she married Harry in the first place. She complained about doing royal duties for just over a year yet the Queen told Meghan she didn't have to do royal duties that her and Harry can work make money she could continue to act if she wanted it was Meghan who made the choice to do royal duties and complained after doing it she's a horrible lying manipulative narcissist she wanted the titles if this was the case Harry would have married the girl from Africa he loved her they didn't marry because she didn't want to live in the uk she didn't want to do royal duties is why Harry didn't marry her. He rushed into this marriage with Meghan because she told Harry she wanted to be apart of the family and be a working royal doing duties for the Queen so he was happy and rushed into marrying her. She new she never wanted to stay she new she just wanted the titles and take off to Hollywood if Harry new this was her plan I don't think he would have married her because I'm sure if he was going to leave the royal family it would be with the other girl and living in the place he loves the most and that's Africa. Harry even said his family can be Meghans family is what sparked her family to speak out it was hurtful especially to the father who raised her and loved her and gave her everything she's a nasty evil women.

  • Katia Ferreira
    Katia Ferreira 9 दिन पहले +125

    Seeing as she herself said ‘titles aren’t important to her’ this should not be a problem. What they deserve for their conniving, cruel behaviour is the stripping off of their tittles altogether and by that I mean the dukedom! 17 lies in the Oprah show alone and all those that followed is just horrendous. All proven! Then the fighting for royal titles during the Queen’s funeral and national mourning was just shameful. If the royal family is such a thorn on their side why still retain the titles that link them to the family? Strip them of their titles once and for all.

    • Debbie Menon
      Debbie Menon 8 दिन पहले +2

      Don't believe a word Sky News puts out there about Harry & Megan and not even the puff pieces they put out on boring Kate & William.

  • Susan De Longis
    Susan De Longis 9 दिन पहले +40

    It’s ridiculous to use “punishment” to describe The King’s right and responsibility to withhold royal privileges from those who not only have chosen to withdraw from royal life, but then make public, false accusations against the monarchy with treacherous consistency.

  • Old Yeller's Channel
    Old Yeller's Channel 9 दिन पहले +282

    We don't have Princess, Princesses, Dukes and Duchesses in the US.
    OR Kings and Queens.
    IF H&M wanted that, they should have stayed in the UK.

    • Dani
      Dani 5 दिन पहले

      @Dawn Elder -- I think that they were safe in Canada's mansion that was supposedly rented and I'm sure that they had sufficient privacy. It was obvious that this was all planned and a stepping stone to Meghan's goal of making it big in California. As it turns out, Calif. is deteriorating at an alarming rate.

    • Ann Coffey
      Ann Coffey 7 दिन पहले +2

      @Dawn Elder Not exactly remote from the perspective of British Columbians. After all, Victoria, the capital of the province, is located on the island. It was, however, remote from Hollywood and didn't have enough cameras for the Harkles.

    • Gee Brewer
      Gee Brewer 7 दिन पहले +3

      @Dawn Elder they have millions, they can pay for their own blasted security. Good for Canada

  • Lindsay Wright
    Lindsay Wright 9 दिन पहले +247

    If King Charles doesn't stop these two by removing their titles , then the Public will start demanding it .

    • Bet Blackman
      Bet Blackman 5 दिन पहले +2

      Not all the public are against Harry and Megan so speak for some people Not all. of Uk I’m one of the public that wouldn’t demand. None of them should have titles they were never Royal any of them

    • C.M. Cordero
      C.M. Cordero 8 दिन पहले +1

      @Jonah Adrien true love won't solve his immigration problems. They don't for anyone else.

    • Frugality Starts at Home
      Frugality Starts at Home 8 दिन पहले +3

      @Kiwi Ann I wouldnt watch "Lady" Colin Campbell if you removed my eyes and attached them to a screen...the woman is utterly appalling in every way, nothing more than a spiteful, malicious fish wife of a gossip, and no more knowledgeable about the inner workings of the Royal Family than you or I.

  • John alex
    John alex 9 दिन पहले +1700

    The thing is, and I say this as an Englishmen, our Monarchy not only has a role but an obligation to perform royal duties in order to get the money they are given
    In other words, be working royals. That is their obligation, which the Queen carried out to her last days. If one of the royal family chooses not to fulfil that obligation that is their right. However, if they are no longer working royals (or put another way. Contributing to the benefit of the UK people and The Commonwealth) they should not be given any money and should not be allowed to hold HRH titles as that is reserved for working royals. You would not pay someone who used to do a job that they no longer do or want to do. The days of giving the monarchy money for just be royal are long gone. The modern Monarchy must earn it's living. Harry and his woman, however, think that they should be given all the prestige of being royal (just so they can be celebrities in America) as well as money without any obligation while at the same time trashing the royal family. I say, bugger of to America Harry and Megan and don't come back until you are ready to apologise to The UK people for the Disrespect that you have shown not only to your own family, but the Disrespect you have shown to our royal family.

    • BerenikiRegina
      BerenikiRegina दिन पहले

      @JRJ I will say this one last time because you keep evading the question. I assume you are living in India. Correct me if I am wrong about that. Taxpayers in the Commonwealth DO NOT give £2, or even 2 pence to the Royal Family. If you insist that they do, I challenge you to prove it. You can't - because it is not true. Your taxes, as a citizen of a Commonwealth country, DO NOT fund rhe Royal Family. So stop talking nonsense and spreading untruths

    • JRJ
      JRJ दिन पहले

      This is only an example do not panic ok! If One country has a population of 2 Billion. And each Taxpayer will give £2 as Sovereign Grant to this one Family means this family will receive £2 Billion Pounds every year and this £2 in due time it will increase due to inflation. As Taxpayers you will pay that £2 or more up to your last breathe. How about you Taxpayers they will give you something to make you rich? No! You need to work hard to earn a living to be able to survive including this one family that you must give £2 as your obligation for a lifetime. That's why they're so filthy rich. All the Royal Family are so rich because from Taxpayers money! C'est la verite!

    • JRJ
      JRJ दिन पहले

      @BerenikiRegina Do your research very well ok! Cost of $58.7.Million Dollars every year from one of the Commonwealth Countries to pay as Monarchy cost! Who are you to question me about my comments base in my research. Who are you too? that I need to prove to you!! SOD OFF!!!

    • Nancy Dublin
      Nancy Dublin दिन पहले

      Amen!!!!

  • Allison Le
    Allison Le 8 दिन पहले +40

    That Oprah interview is a stab in the Queen’s heart.

    • LESLIE MILSAP
      LESLIE MILSAP 3 दिन पहले +1

      What was Charles interview about them being cold parents back in the day? H & M said nothing about the Queen! If so, tell me what they said about her! I'm waiting.....

    • Mary Scally
      Mary Scally 4 दिन पहले +2

      Totally agree

  • Estrella
    Estrella 9 दिन पहले +117

    not only they gave up the titles, the Queen decided to give them a whole year to think about it before making it official. And they made it official! The queen delayed it, because she knew that Harry would lose everything (uniforms, patronages, and titles). And they still chose to leave. An it will never be enough.

    • Advanced Driving
      Advanced Driving 7 दिन पहले

      He showed his appreciation by not going to see her days before her death, knowing she was in ill health with not much time to go at 96.

    • Judy Ivie
      Judy Ivie 7 दिन पहले

      Kinda forgot about that .

    • Debbie Menon
      Debbie Menon 8 दिन पहले

      Harry & Megan are not dumb or stupid although the media might want to portray them as such. They knew pretty much what to expect and obviously did not consider it a loss. Their freedom from living in a racist stifling environment meant more to them than the titles and PR job. Harry is doing right by his family, choosing to live a normal life.

  • The Kid
    The Kid 9 दिन पहले +57

    I believe Charles made it clear in his speech what role the Harkle's had when he just mentioned them by their first names, he didn't even address them as Duke or Duchess.

    • Mary Scally
      Mary Scally 3 दिन पहले

      Ye know it doesn't matter anymore, I will miss mostly the Queens delivery speech on Christmas Day, and God rest her soul.

    • Mary Scally
      Mary Scally 3 दिन पहले

      Lol Harkle's good one

    • *Be Free*
      *Be Free* 6 दिन पहले +1

      Perfectly Understated. Loved it.

    • Kirra
      Kirra 8 दिन पहले +2

      When he said that I had high hopes. They make my skin crawl.

    • brookside109
      brookside109 8 दिन पहले +5

      Exactly what I heard too from his speech. He clearly said that Harry and Meghan live overseas … tells everyone listening that he is not going to tolerate any more nonsense and their children are not going to be HRh prince and princess.

  • Khira's Journey
    Khira's Journey 9 दिन पहले +108

    They're reaping the consequences of their actions. They didn't think twice about defaming the institution; I don't think the King should think twice about excluding them. It's righteous judgment.

    • Jonah Adrien
      Jonah Adrien 7 दिन पहले +1

      Do not wash your dirty mouth on the most happy family. For who God bless no man curse. Please clean your back yard, before cleaning some one else's back yard

    • Arctic badger
      Arctic badger 7 दिन पहले +3

      Too right 👏👏👍

  • Matt Hull
    Matt Hull 9 दिन पहले +37

    For everyone outside the U.K who doesn't know this : When harry says his farther and brother are trapped thats a bare faced lie they can abdicate the throne if they wised too, What he means is they dont want to abdicate because if they both had done some years ago he would have the throne

  • B Schultz
    B Schultz 9 दिन पहले +16

    Not “punishments”, just consequences.

  • Elly Neilsen
    Elly Neilsen 9 दिन पहले +34

    I hope he does as these two have been so incredibly disrespectful to the whole Royal Family! Their love story, what a load of bull crap that is? Oprah should be ashamed of herself for airing a program full of lies from start to finish!

    • Son NeverSets
      Son NeverSets 9 दिन पहले +5

      Opie doesn’t have any shame.
      Anymore than those 2 sick opportunists.

  • Pommie 🐻 Bears
    Pommie 🐻 Bears 9 दिन पहले +158

    My sisters ex was half Indian. When my sister was pregnant, we spoke on what colour my niece would be. She’s 30 now, and absolutely gorgeous. To make it out to be something sinister is just spiteful.

    • Jane Grainger
      Jane Grainger 6 दिन पहले +1

      It’s a normal question to ask - in a mixed marriage- both families wonder

    • annalise felix
      annalise felix 6 दिन पहले

      i cant recall skin colour being an issue in UK, America yes(not all Americans, though. the Americans i do know are lovely ). racism is alive everywhere where people of different skin colours live. the secret i suppose is not to feed such negatives. however, since rachel didnt get what she wanted and took henry with her to USA, Btitain has become a racist people. unfortunately wherever that woman goes, she causes destruction and really does not care who or what she destroy in her wake. what has henry done

    • Helen Webster
      Helen Webster 7 दिन पहले

      @Dawn Elder You ‘warned him’ that you had native blood? Jesus, that’s some self-loathing.

    • Dawn Elder
      Dawn Elder 7 दिन पहले +1

      Every family wonders what the children will look like. And most people in North America who go back at least a century has some interesting mixtures in their background.
      I watch a video of a black man describing the birth of his first child. He was black and his wife was black. Everyone went silent when the baby was born. White skin and red hair. His wife asked who the baby looked like. It looked exactly like his uncle.
      When I married my husband I warned him we had native blood and it shows up every now and then. I have ancestors going back into the 1600s. Things happened.
      Wondering who the baby will look like is normal for all families.

    • Iz Zy
      Iz Zy 8 दिन पहले

      @Helen Webster yes, it can.

  • A G
    A G 9 दिन पहले +1236

    I can not stand Oprah, what a disgusting thing for her to do.
    "HoLd Up HoLd UpPpP" 🥴
    Then to try to get an invite to the funeral while trying to distance herself from her vile actions 🤣 how pathetic she looks

    • Suesanti D. P Balraj
      Suesanti D. P Balraj 8 दिन पहले

      @Lalalee Lee ... ha ha 😂
      She's not going away

    • Cha
      Cha 8 दिन पहले

      I died at that bit.... 🤣 💀 😂. There was a conversation.... nooooo. No need to ask any details about it lol

  • Becky Ryan
    Becky Ryan 9 दिन पहले +31

    Why should kids that live outside the United Kingdom doesn't need the titles as they aren't recognized by the United States. As for Oprah she is a prime example of yellow journalism.

  • Tom Moncrieff
    Tom Moncrieff 8 दिन पहले +19

    Please don’t say ‘stripped’ or ‘banned’. They do not have these titles unless granted by Letters Patent. The Queen did not grant them as great grandchildren of the monarch have no royal titles unless their father is the eldest son of the Prince of Wales. Charles has not granted them so they can’t be stripped. No one says Edward’s children were stripped of their titles, they are the first grandchildren through the male line of a British monarch not to be a Prince or Princess, they are Lord James (Viscount Severn) and Lady Louise. Their parents are full time working royals and the children often accompany them. Archie should be the Earl of Dumbarton, Harry’s secondary title, but we’re told Meghan declined to accept it because she didn’t like the place name starting with Dumb. What’s the point anyway? They live in California, there is and can be no royalty in California, she just wants these titles for marketing and cashflow.

    • Anastajia2005
      Anastajia2005 6 दिन पहले +1

      That was one of the most ignorant things that Me-Gain ever said. She did not win any popularity votes with the people of Dumbarton. Had she or that hapless Prince looked up the history of Dumbarton they might have had second thoughts. (Glad they didn't) One would think that stupid appearance might have studied some of the history of Scotland seeing as the old Queen Mother was born there and our late Queen was so fond of going there to enjoy some carefree time, then again he never was too bright, still isn't. I for one am so glad that William will be the King some day. I will never see that day as I am way too old. Those too just need to do us all a favour and fade away. Without him, she is nothing and without her, he cannot find his way to the toilet.

  • Anderson Omo
    Anderson Omo 9 दिन पहले +29

    "Father and my brother are trapped, they don't get to leave" So incredibly ironic that he's FAR more trapped, and in a snake pit. He's no longer respected, probably has significant money worries, married to a narcissist who will not be happy until she has his bits on a platter when this train wreck finally comes to a halt - and it will. He's such an idiot - but I hope he doesn't do anything really stupid when the implosion occurs.

    • Marsida Llapi
      Marsida Llapi 7 दिन पहले +1

      As a father u love and treat your children the same not different, and it doesn’t matter what the situation it’s u should be there and give them a chance to change, and u do that because ur a father first than ur a population Kings.

    • marcia coe
      marcia coe 8 दिन पहले

      He needs to grow up, get over his so called hurt. He’s lived a charmed life, never worrying about where his next meal came from, or how to find enough money to pay his bills. People who trash there families are the worst type of people. His wife brought out the worst qualities in him, so unequally yoked. She’s a jezebel and he’s her victim. Me first is a sign of the times. One day he will wake up and throughly be disgusted by that decision to put a ring on her finger. She’ll lose all control over Harry, and will it be to late. Wake up Harry

  • B Lawson
    B Lawson 8 दिन पहले +11

    They said that they didn't want titles for the children and Archie was offered the title of Earl of Dumbarton, they refused saying that he would be called dumb. This is a slap in the face to the people of Scotland 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

  • Samuel Schick
    Samuel Schick 9 दिन पहले +45

    Harry brought all of this on himself.

    • Jean Taylor
      Jean Taylor 9 दिन पहले +1

      He did indeed but now REALLY knows what it is to be trapped - by his own choice of wife!
      If it weren't for the children he would be back...

  • anita balaski
    anita balaski 9 दिन पहले +27

    I don't see what King Charles is doing as a punishment. Harry and Meghan gave up their royal roles so the titles should be gone too IMO. With all the proven lies the two have told in interviews, books, etc how could the monarchy ever trust them again.

  • Hred Lars
    Hred Lars 9 दिन पहले +102

    Excuse me? Hello? Prince Harry demanded his children be removed from the royal family to protect them. Prince Harry.

    • Colin G
      Colin G 8 दिन पहले +1

      @Maria Revell i think they are rented.

    • Maria Revell
      Maria Revell 8 दिन पहले +2

      They should be protected from H and M their own parents.... Poor poor children...are they kept in the attic???

    • J P
      J P 8 दिन पहले +1

      😂

  • MiladydeWinter
    MiladydeWinter 9 दिन पहले +14

    "That conversation I am never going to share" ------ that's because it never took place Harry !!!

  • Wiley Fox
    Wiley Fox 9 दिन पहले +97

    Harry must be a huge disappointment to his Father. Sill boy doesn't seem to have the intellectual capacity to understand the consequences of his actions. On the other hand Migraine knows exactly what is going on.

    • A h
      A h 8 दिन पहले +1

      Hahaha migraine 🤣 love that

    • Alexandrena Wordie
      Alexandrena Wordie 9 दिन पहले

      @Joan Sommerfield IT IS FACT ACCEPT IT 👍

    • B.J. Hinote
      B.J. Hinote 9 दिन पहले

      I dont think hes served in military. So they walked away from it Harry was told his whole life you will never be king so why does it matter if they live private. Whats the big deal. Still could be family.

    • Joan Sommerfield
      Joan Sommerfield 9 दिन पहले +3

      And you know this for a fact? Be really careful of presumption.

  • prympammi
    prympammi 9 दिन पहले +239

    I’m not even British and I’m hoping he does!! They won’t stop until they are “stopped”

    • Arctic badger
      Arctic badger 7 दिन पहले +1

      They’re a f’ng scurge
      Strip & exile’em I say
      🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🤨

    • GrannyD Daljeet
      GrannyD Daljeet 8 दिन पहले +4

      You are right
      They won’t stop until they are stopped. Come on KC do your duty. Stop them from doing more harm .

    • Debbie Menon
      Debbie Menon 8 दिन पहले

      Stop what? Living off the British taxpayer and be bullied by the inmates and the media ? They chose not to, didn't they? Leave them alone.

  • Tom Ripley
    Tom Ripley 8 दिन पहले +17

    There are two types of girlfriend I’ve learned: the one who seeks to smooth things over and mediate when you have an argument with your brother, and the one who pours fuel on the fire because it’s one less person who takes your attention away from her. Harry married the last one.

    • Sandra Benham
      Sandra Benham 6 दिन पहले +1

      Men can be like that too.

  • Chung Jones
    Chung Jones 9 दिन पहले +381

    The royals are better off if Harry and his family’s titles are removed and they can continue to lives as private family. This agony of nonsense must be stopped by the change of the law and whatever it takes…. I think the whole world understood what the King Charles was signaling right after queen’s passing except the narcissistic couple from CA.

    • Coco W.
      Coco W. 8 दिन पहले

      @Rositta Garthof He left the monarchy! You can't have your cake and eat it too.

    • Rositta Garthof
      Rositta Garthof 8 दिन पहले

      Mine commed was shot they didn’t like my respond

    • Rositta Garthof
      Rositta Garthof 8 दिन पहले +1

      He war’s as a Prince born, is He birth rights

  • Julie Raistrick
    Julie Raistrick 9 दिन पहले +227

    I don’t have the words to describe how despicable these two are. They lie and whinge their way through life, hypocritical and contradictory, it’s all about them. Harry is just a puppet in her power game, he deserves everything he gets for being so weak and gullible. The hurt they caused Queen Elizabeth in the years before her death was so very cruel. Long live The King. 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

    • Malibu’s Most Wanted
      Malibu’s Most Wanted 8 दिन पहले

      The man is lead how tf are you going to blame Megan 😂.

    • Debbie Hughes
      Debbie Hughes 9 दिन पहले +1

      @Gay Davenport if I did have a choice I would like to know Harry but definitely wouldn't want anything to do with her

    • Debbie Hughes
      Debbie Hughes 9 दिन पहले +1

      @AutobotProwleryou mean what the bloody heck is wrong with her

    • Debbie Hughes
      Debbie Hughes 9 दिन पहले +2

      Well said 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

  • Yose MT
    Yose MT 9 दिन पहले +167

    I don't understand why talking about skin color of babies of mixed race couple is regarded as racists. Wouldn't it wonderful to see how wonderful mixed race kids usually come out? It's actually very exciting to see. That's the beauty of diversity.

    • Joi Hubbard
      Joi Hubbard 8 दिन पहले

      @Herzog Absolutely! Obviously if they got offended it wasn’t said in a positive manner!

    • Joi Hubbard
      Joi Hubbard 8 दिन पहले

      You need to stop it! You know exactly what they meant when they said they wanted to know how dark they will be!

  • LTyrell
    LTyrell 9 दिन पहले +19

    Is anybody actually interested in their supposed 'love' story, when the truth seems to be that she targeted him and manipulated him from the start.

  • Mary Ranieri
    Mary Ranieri 9 दिन पहले +241

    King Charles III would be wise to change the letters patent so that the Markle's children will not be prince and princess and should strip them of their remaining titles so that they can no longer monetize the Monarchy!

    • wendy coyne
      wendy coyne 8 दिन पहले

      @mary alston Harry is the second son of Charles and Diana, only the eldest child's children get to be Prince and Princess. Prince Edward was the Queens child too, his children are not Prince and Princess either. William is the Kings Heir followed by George, Charlotte and Louis.

    • mary alston
      mary alston 8 दिन पहले

      Where you from he cannot rewrite the birth off his son Harry that would mean Lady DIANA were never his wife man

    • wendy coyne
      wendy coyne 8 दिन पहले +3

      Only the children of the Kings heir are entitled to be known as Prince or Princess. Nothing is being taken away from Harry's children. Princess Margaret's children are not Prince or Princess (she was he second child of King George VI)

    • David Granville Hunter
      David Granville Hunter 9 दिन पहले

      Read that only parliament can take away their titles and that bill as its 2nd reading in December. If there is a God let it pass into law.

  • M Ricci
    M Ricci 8 दिन पहले +7

    Stealing the Queen's pet name Lillibet is unforgivable. Kick them out!

  • Marion Thompson
    Marion Thompson 9 दिन पहले +12

    Hope so. This duo deserve nothing less than permanent exile and titles withdrawn. Enough already.

  • Number1bitch
    Number1bitch 8 दिन पहले +36

    I can’t believe she ruined her childrens future over a memoir and podcast 😢

  • Trinity Lane
    Trinity Lane 9 दिन पहले +931

    I think if Harry's book attacks Camilla that may be the final straw for King Charles. He may even strip the Duke & Duchess title from Harry & Meghan if they attack Camilla whom Charles loves very much.

    • Brian Whittington
      Brian Whittington 5 दिन पहले

      @BerenikiRegina Yes I know it gets very complicated with inter marriage between families. I think it much better if they'd kept to marrying of a similar social class. They know the protocol inside out and don't look to try and overturn centuries of tradition. Don't get me wrong, some high ranked ones can have a rebel streak. But when you have freedom of choice, and you start looking at the lower classes, or "new money" , it just invites problems. I take some interest through shared distant grandparents with Elizabeth Bowes Lyon.

    • Booksnink
      Booksnink 5 दिन पहले

      @Gen X ~ Fem ~ 78 his birth name actually is Henry, the name Harry does not appear on his birth certificate

    • BerenikiRegina
      BerenikiRegina 6 दिन पहले

      @Brian Whittington It is true that European ( and Russian) princes and princesses are not the same as in the UK with regard to being considered "royal". Prince Metternich, for example, was granted the title of prince for his services to the Austrian Empire. As far as Princess Michael of Kent is concerned, I looked her up and the closest I could find to mention of her being "royalty" was that on her father's side, she is a descendant of the Nostitz family, who are also ancestors of Queen Elizabeth II. That may mean no more than that a common ancestor married into the aristocratic, but not royal family of the late Queen's mother. If you are going the "one drop" rule used for determining racial purity in the American South in the Jim Crow era, there are literally thousands of people who could lay claim to royal blood (not necessarily on the right side of the blanket). Moreover, it's been a very long time since royals (even European royals) have been required to marry other royals. Look at the Royal houses of Europe.

    • Brian Whittington
      Brian Whittington 6 दिन पहले

      @BerenikiRegina You might need to rethink that, definitely royals, or at least aristocratic enough to marry other royals and assume a "Princess" title. Remember the European titles don't always align with the UK titles that sound similar, and she did have more than one. Yes I remember the Nazi connection being an issue, and her being nicknamed Princess Pushy by some. I've seen her close up more than once, she apeared nice and friendly. She did not seem to have any arrogant nature that some say earned her that nickname.

  • L Jon
    L Jon 8 दिन पहले +8

    That Opera woman is seriously peculiar. The fact that people actually PAY to watch and listen to her is even more peculiar. It shows that M and H don't have a lot of sense to get mixed up with such a strange and self-serving person.

  • karekarenz
    karekarenz 9 दिन पहले +15

    No Prince or Princess titles for grandchildren living in the United States, with one born in the USA. And didn't their parents say they didn't want titles for their children? What's changed?

    • 1920brooks
      1920brooks 7 दिन पहले

      celebrity and money it might bring

  • Bea Noguier
    Bea Noguier 9 दिन पहले +5

    How can you make someone prince and princess when you can’t see them. Or even know they are from the blood line

  • Amanda Cox
    Amanda Cox 9 दिन पहले +32

    I don't feel sorry for them! They know nothing of loyalty, of duty or empathy towards others! They are only worried about what's in it for them and they don't care who they destroy in their blind ambition to achieve their fame and fortune! Karma is coming tho, and she's not happy with these two!! 😈

  • Jon Forrest
    Jon Forrest 9 दिन पहले +539

    I agree with Piers Morgan that Harry and Megan should be stripped of their titles as well. If they want to leave the Royal family and want to be private citizens, that is their right. However, they should not be allowed to use royal titles for sake of celebrity.

    • Dupè
      Dupè 4 दिन पहले

      @Kris D Harry isn't Prince of Wales but Duke of Sussex

    • Dupè
      Dupè 4 दिन पहले

      @Kris D Prince too could be taken.

    • Dupè
      Dupè 4 दिन पहले

      Exactly. May God safe us and our family from this type of a wife like Rachel Megan Raglan Markle.

    • Gideon Roos
      Gideon Roos 8 दिन पहले +1

      @Denise Munoz Harry is prince only because of his position in the line of succession. That's very different from holding a landed title that is Prince. Before William got the landed title for Wales, he was also only prince by position in the line of succession. However, he now has a landed title, which is much stronger than one granted only out of courtesy because of relation to the monarch.
      In traditional monarchies, landed titles are always senior to unlanded (honorary) titles.

    • Denise Munoz
      Denise Munoz 8 दिन पहले

      @Gideon Roos That's not exactly true. Harry is a prince, as this is his birthright title ( unfortunately) which cannot be removed. King Charles could strip him of his HRH though.

  • Deborah Berry
    Deborah Berry 9 दिन पहले +18

    I think it would be doing Harry’s children a favor to take away all titles of the family, Duke, Duchess, Prince, Princess. They are going to grow up in America, & titles will give them a sense of superiority & entitlements. Not good. Let them grow up as normal Americans.

    • C.M. Cordero
      C.M. Cordero 9 दिन पहले +1

      Amen! These two want to have their cake and eat it too. They are so annoying and come across as just plain spoiled and/ or stupid sometimes.
      Don’t live in the US if you want to hang onto titles.

  • Old Yeller's Channel
    Old Yeller's Channel 9 दिन पहले +6

    STOP calling the child "Lilibet", you traitors!

  • བོད་པ་
    བོད་པ་ 9 दिन पहले +7

    Good decision.. king should do this asap.. this narcissist woman n her husband dnt deserve this title

  • Carole Porter
    Carole Porter 9 दिन पहले +12

    Before ANY TITLES TO THEIR CHILDREN..THERE SHOULD
    BE DNA..S..THERES TOO MANY QUESTIONS LIES
    And MYSTERY SURROUNDING THEIR
    BIRTHS!!!.

    • Sandra Benham
      Sandra Benham 6 दिन पहले

      Definitely. We don't even know if the photos are of the real children or if there are any children at all. Many people think this is the case.

  • Sue Roche
    Sue Roche 8 दिन पहले +3

    I would hope that this story is true and the King does remove their titles including meghan and harrys title. I would have loads more respect if it happened

  • Elaine
    Elaine 9 दिन पहले +26

    Isn't it peculiar that Gayle King, Oprahs best friend, MM's mouthpiece with receipts was in London doing the coverage of the Queens funeral for the same network that aired their interview? Also that little pieces of information about H & M would come out every now and then, also Scooby who wrote the Freedom book with them was a royal correspondent for ABC news tv in the US and he was talking like he was having conversations with them. Isn't it strange that these stations have nobody else that works for them that can cover the two vultures unbiasedly? Pay attention a "friend" of H & M will be leaking stories before long, but of course they won't have a clue who it could be (themselves as always).

  • Jerry Huculiak
    Jerry Huculiak 9 दिन पहले +10

    Harry and Meghan thoughtlessly have put themself in a position that even (if) King Charles granted forgiveness the mess created will never disappear. Harry and Meghan need to be realistic of the situation created by them. This is not a cinema with a script with a happy ending. The worse thing of all is the blatant insult to the monarchy Queen Elizabeth and then down the line to father and brother. Then on top of all this you complain constant that Royal perks have been removed. This is comparable to buying a donut you like and complain relentlessly about the hole. Harry and Meghan what did you expect to happen? You piss on your family and think nothing of it. You made complete fools of yourselves by trying to make fools of Royalty. Like the make believe world of Hollywood you rode off into the sunset. You were not pushed by your Royal Family. You brought this on by yourself. It's a pity. You may grow up as your children do maybe they can help you on the way. God Save the King.

  • Priya Layon
    Priya Layon 9 दिन पहले +12

    You two are not trapped anymore , so leave and never return ..stop making fun of yourself 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 they don't want responsibility but want titles..disgusting 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • Louisa C
    Louisa C 9 दिन पहले +3

    The entire world looked on AND participated in the most famous, beautiful, amazing funeral of her late Majesty the Queen. Every single person bore witness to the incredible legacy of her Majesty which now rests with King Charles, Prince William and his son. The RF and members of the UK and the Commonwealth hold renewed solidarity and pride in Queen Elizabeth's legacy. I believe King Charles now has the support of the world in taking action to prevent Meghan Markle and Prince Harry from humiliating and embarrassing members of the Royal Family further.
    Every Diplomat, King, and President bearing witness to her Majesty's funeral must have been reflecting on the outrageous behaviour of Harry and Meegain and what they themselves would do, should this happen within their own families.
    King Charles has support of the people and he will gain more respect as he takes steps to protect his family and their legacy. Prince Charles will always love Harry, but no parent should be held hostage to outrageous demands of their adult child. Harry has lived a privilege, over-indulged life and he's about to get a lesson in basic courtesy. I also hope that King Charles and the RF take legal action on any lies that this couple perpetuates.

  • Ken MacLean
    Ken MacLean 9 दिन पहले +5

    The 'colour of the baby' question is one that EVERYONE in the world would consider, and would only refrain from asking if they THOUGHT it would offend a racially 'sensitive' person!

    • Maria Revell
      Maria Revell 8 दिन पहले

      And Harry laughed and said I hope my future children don't have my pasty skin...and his wife turned it into a drama..

  • Sheila Torio
    Sheila Torio 9 दिन पहले +2

    I never watched that Oprah interview in full. Only seen these shorts. Harry holding back even that little bit gives me hope.

  • bjklein444
    bjklein444 9 दिन पहले +6

    Didn't anyone think to ask if it was Harry that brought up the subject? I'm sorry, but I don't trust these two. 🦨🐍

  • Yuning
    Yuning 9 दिन पहले +17

    By now we should know that the book will be borderline fiction, and the documentary will be a movie directed by an ego exploding formal actress. Netflix and Spotify collect worldwide membership and subscription fees to pay the duo; entertaining.

    • Alexandrena Wordie
      Alexandrena Wordie 8 दिन पहले +1

      Think you mean Z Lister 👍

    • Son NeverSets
      Son NeverSets 9 दिन पहले +3

      Think you mean ‘former’ B actress.

  • Sharon Boot
    Sharon Boot 8 दिन पहले +2

    if anyone walks away from a job how can they expect to carry on getting the perks of that job. Unbelievable!!

  • Bogo Jeon
    Bogo Jeon 9 दिन पहले +3

    Since they decided take down from duty, let them grow their children like common citizen. Why they want such title? Its absurd.

  • W. Meier
    W. Meier 9 दिन पहले +8

    Not gifting the titles is not same as taking them away. Doing what one promised , aka slimming down the monarchy is not petty. Not letting youre son trample over you and youre parents, aka Prince Phillip and the Queen, makes you a good parent. Not giving in to demands and blackmailing, as in I havn ´t signed an nda, makes you a good king. Well done King Charles

    • Linda Patterson
      Linda Patterson 8 दिन पहले

      I remember then Prince Charles ,speaking about a streamlined monarchy years before Harry met Megan

  • Phoenix Mode
    Phoenix Mode 9 दिन पहले +2

    That's what happens when you die.
    Your descendants do whatever the hell they want after you're gone, regardless of what's right and true.

  • laura bee
    laura bee 9 दिन पहले +24

    I blame the wife. Harry was a different guy before she got her hooks in him- when he was training down in Yuma on Apaches, everyone loved the guy, he was friendly and kind, generous to a fault. It's amazing what one bad spouse can do to the other by mental manipulation. Just my opinion.

    • LisbethStark
      LisbethStark 8 दिन पहले

      He also did some stupid things growing up. He was very protected by the Royal Family. He was somewhat jealous of William.
      William was the golden child and that is not also fair on a human level to Harry.
      Harry, though, had privilege, protection and freedom to choose almost any thing he wanted to do. William had all the duty, responsibility and training for one job only.

  • Rem Remy
    Rem Remy 9 दिन पहले +1

    “ … and I have huge compassion for that … “ “that”!? “ … and that conversation I’m never going to share … “. While, pertinently, doing just that. What hypocrisy from our self-exiled prince. And watch his face when saying the latter: look at that creepy smirk.

  • Kathrynn
    Kathrynn 9 दिन पहले +83

    It just makes Charles look weal and petty. The fact that the birthing of those two children was kept secret and not witnessed or proclaimed by any Royal reliable source should automatically disqualify them from the line of succession.

    • Alexandrena Wordie
      Alexandrena Wordie 9 दिन पहले +7

      Bullshit King Charles III IS NOT Weak and what the hell is Weal ???????????

    • Jasper Horace
      Jasper Horace 9 दिन पहले +13

      Give Charles a chance. This doesn’t have to be done immediately. I hope Charles’s vengeance will be awesome to behold after Hazmat tells lies about Camilla.

  • Marcia Wood
    Marcia Wood 9 दिन पहले +31

    I don’t think, as the reporter states, that King Charles removing titles or not allowing titles to be given is a form of punishment. It’s a about protecting the Monarchy… that is his duty. Prince Harry and his children live in USA, one being born there and Harry has stated he does not want to return. It’s regrettable but duty has to come first. I feel sure Charles loves Harry as any father would but he is now King and has a path to follow.

  • Planet_Molly
    Planet_Molly 8 दिन पहले

    @John Alex - Very clearly, concisely and respectfully stated! Thank you!

  • Chelle Campbell
    Chelle Campbell 8 दिन पहले

    While I can understand the actions (etc) against H & M, it's a little unfair to take actions (etc) against the children. They are young, innocent, have no say in this ... it's not really **them** that is doing all this, it's their parents, and its a little unfair to make them (children) "pay the price" for the actions of their parents. If, when they are of age to be a "working royal", they decide that's not the life they want then fine, remove their titles. However, **if** they get to be of age where they DO want to be a "working royal", then allow them to do so, which would include them being allowed to keep/retain their titles. In the meantime, let them keep their "titles". Strip from M & H if you feel you must, however don't make the children - very young children - pay the price. And this is coming from an American. I understand that we don't have this kind of stuff here in the States - we don't have a monarchy and therefore don't have to deal/think about royals losing titles and so forth - however from the outside looking in (so to speak) it just seems a bit harsh to go after the children when, technically, they've done nothing wrong. If need be, make it conditional - that M & H can't do anything to "market" their children as royals, that they can't make any kind of money off that aspect of their lives in any way/manner, and if they do, then the kids lose their titles (at least until they are "of age" and can make the decision, legally, for themselves).
    The thing is, Harry wants it known what happened in regards to Diana and threatening to remove their titles (and whatever else) is the "family's" way of trying to get him to shut up, to not go forward with the book. Harry is tired of covering up for them, and he has known about the background details of her death which is also something that put a wedge between him and his father. There's a lot of stuff in the background that the general public doesn't know, that I think Harry would probably put in his book, that his father and the rest of the family don't want publicized.

  • Frank Ozoh
    Frank Ozoh 8 दिन पहले +2

    I don't really think H&M need titles for their successes in the globe.
    H&M can move on with their lives and reveal only the truth about their experiences in the RF.

  • Fiona Bunker
    Fiona Bunker 9 दिन पहले +3

    Quite right too! You're either with The Monarchy or against! The choice is yours Harry and Megan! Actions have consequences!

  • Roxy DownUnder
    Roxy DownUnder 8 दिन पहले +1

    Megain clings like a “Limpet” to the titles bestowed on her by the Queen, yet trashes the Royal Family at every opportunity…utter hypocrite… and still thinks they deserve titles for their children…omg!

  • Alida Botes
    Alida Botes 9 दिन पहले +3

    He just has to. 2 more titles & they can claim protection from every country they visit & they have access to classified security info. They will use that to have him & William taken out.

  • LadyCymbeline
    LadyCymbeline 9 दिन पहले +2

    When Archie was born in 2019, Meghan and Harry were still active HRH status and a royal Duke and Duchess. Archie was thus entitled from birth to hold the next highest rank of his father in accordance with that region, which would have been "Earl of Dumbarton." So, Archie could have been styled "HRH Archie, The Earl of Dumbarton" from birth. However, it is reported the couple DID NOT like this name and wanted an exception to be made to make him a prince from birth. Even though he was a great-grandchild of the monarch at the time and not a direct heir, they thought this was unfair as an exception was made for Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis to have the princely rank. Originally, it was only supposed to be Prince George to get the prince title at birth and Charlotte and Louis would have waited until the Queen died to claim theirs. The late Queen changed this so all of William's children would have the same rank and also made Charlotte keep her place after George always. Her younger brother Louis doesn't precede her. So, it was a groundbreaking change and an exception for the direct heirs of the crown (the Cambridges at the time). When Meghan and Harry did not get the exception, they chose no title for Archie, similarly for Lilibet. Unfortunate to say, but they were waiting until this moment the Queen passed away to take it up with Charles.
    Currently, Harry and Meghan have a *legal claim* by inheritance to the titles prince and princess for their children through the current letters patent that are published for over a century. However (!) all of these decisions about titles are ultimately at the discretion of the current monarch. King Charles has the final say about what he will legally pass on and credit as a title. It has be *officially issued and approved from his office* - it isn't automatic. He can just as easily amend a letter, especially on these matters, it is up to him the vision of his reign and the extension of his "court" so to speak - who represents him, and where. There has to be negotiations and knowledge that the titles come with a responsibility and expectation.
    In this unique case, I see the strife in the decision. Prince Harry and Meghan have stepped down from royal duty. As part of their departure agreement, it was agreed upon that they do NOT represent the royal family in any official capacity. This is a conundrum then, given their current status, why and how they want these fully noble and weighty titles for their children. The couple made it clear that their future is not in this hierarchy, country, or in this work. To me, it seems they either have to give up their entertainment and brand work in America and go back to royal duty 100% with their children growing up as supporters of the family, or they quit asking for something that would be void of meaning if not HRH anyway. It will cause much confusion, especially unfair for the next generation that there will be legitimate working Princes and Princesses (Wales) and those just called Prince and Princess (Sussex) living in America. We don't know how far Meghan and Harry want to brand the children's names either, especially after Charles passes on. If given HRH it could cheapen their whole reputation as a working monarchy entrenched in public service... their HRH names are published in history books and ceremonial placards, not ever meant to be on a children's clothing line at Macy's for instance. Tough decision. A lot of broken trust between these families. I don't envy King Charles!

    • Sabine Gierth-Waniczek
      Sabine Gierth-Waniczek 9 दिन पहले +1

      Thank you for your excellent summary of this whole debacle!!!
      Hopefully KC3 listens to his courtly advisers. I am convinced that they must be working overtime to present to him an array of possible actions and consequences.
      If the children get the titles, KC3 will instantly lose the goodwill of a majority of his citizens, maybe even help to usher in a republic, and in spite of this the Sussex brand could STILL be marketed, as many people far from the UK do not understand entirely what a title means.
      The Sussexes will continue to use the titles, even after a republic might be installed. They agreed in the Sandringham conference that they would not act as royals, not use their HRH, not merchandise anything in connection with ANY title -> they do it nevertheless, and there are NO CONSEQUENCES!
      This will spell trouble for the new monarch, the family and his successor.

  • Paula E Martin
    Paula E Martin 9 दिन पहले +6

    Harry Knows why his children will not get titles

  • Herzog
    Herzog 9 दिन पहले +5

    I’m from the Los Angeles area and I know where Meghan was raised fairly well. I kinda don’t blame Charles. If you don’t show up for work…. Don’t expect to be paid. I’ve never understood Meg. She had to know what being a royal entailed, yet my guess is she pulled Harry away from his family and country to focus on herself. Was it really necessary to expose everyone? Short on cash? I’d wager that she will always have something up her sleeve, so she can keep up the life she feels entitled to. Just odd. I know it’s easier said then done, but I think I would have zipped my lip and fought through it all…made the best of it.
    What’s up with this American princess stuff? Uh , no, we don’t do that here… remember? I feel slightly insulted by her need to be curtsied to here in the US boy, I see it coming. When she was wed to Harry I was so proud of her, now, all I can think is how full Brits hands are going to be..

  • Sunnydreamer1470
    Sunnydreamer1470 8 दिन पहले +2

    Ban everything from these two grifters! I dumped my Netflix!!! Sick of all of this ! Rewarding people who lie is wrong!

  • Christi Mcbride
    Christi Mcbride 8 दिन पहले +1

    I do not need to hear their allegations again. With the provable lies, I have doubts about anything they say.

  • Pamkarita
    Pamkarita 9 दिन पहले +1

    She lies without moving one face muscle, incredible

  • Just Julia
    Just Julia 9 दिन पहले +464

    Fun fact: There’s no monarchy in America so their titles mean nothing to us..Princess Pinocchio and her tall tales should buy some secluded land far far away..and never return.
    The end.

    • Anastajia2005
      Anastajia2005 6 दिन पहले

      @Gabrielle Andrew With a one way ticket.

    • Michell Tulipa
      Michell Tulipa 8 दिन पहले

      @P C HI! They dont..they are known for having better manners. That's all.

    • P C
      P C 8 दिन पहले

      @Michell Tulipa How exactly do Zooey Deschanel and Zoe Kravitz fit into this ?

    • Siri Zurc
      Siri Zurc 8 दिन पहले +1

      @D Carbs totally agree with you ...but what can you really expect from her ? Her father did pampered and look how she turn around and did him ...Imo she never out grew being a spoiled brat just like just Harry!

    • Maria Revell
      Maria Revell 8 दिन पहले +1

      @Jade Bell very scary thought and people should be alarmed...many people barely survive now everything has sky rocketed ... Nobody has spare money for the Harkles anywhere in the world...

  • leogirl31 Samuel
    leogirl31 Samuel 6 दिन पहले

    Is any of this even true? I hope this news source has credible information, otherwise I smell a lawsuit coming their way.

  • Idont Care
    Idont Care 8 दिन पहले +1

    Aww I feel so sorry for them…..NOT!

  • Dele Famuyiwa
    Dele Famuyiwa 8 दिन पहले +1

    Sky,
    Can you please lay off this negativity while the loss of the Queen is still fresh? Can you please show some respect? Yes, they are public figures, but even so are they not human like the rest of us? C'mon.

  • Mama Cita
    Mama Cita 8 दिन पहले +1

    DO IT! DO IT!
    PLEASE, dear God…DOOOOOOOO ITTTTTTT

  • Kate Park
    Kate Park 9 दिन पहले +584

    They are the perfect example of I WANT EVERYTHING BUT DON'T DO ANYTHING. Such toxic people, they only want to use the titles to make money but not the responsibilities the title carry. How is that they never heard the "a big power comes with a big responsibility". They want the prestige but not the obligation.

    • Alexandrena Wordie
      Alexandrena Wordie 3 दिन पहले

      @Boom ds WHY ????

    • Boom ds
      Boom ds 3 दिन पहले

      @Alexandrena Wordie if they really gave they’d sell all that damn property and jewels and give the money to the British people

    • Alexandrena Wordie
      Alexandrena Wordie 9 दिन पहले +2

      @Boom ds The Entire Real Royal Family never never ever make Money of the Public They don’t take they GIVE If you were Intelligent enough You should know This 🙄 Try stopping yourself making a FOOL OUT OF YOURSELF 🤷🏻‍♀️

  • kiki64 allen
    kiki64 allen 9 दिन पहले +1

    Incorrect bs as usual! HMTK has to bequeath the right for the supposed children to use any title and he has not done so. If he had they would have been given those titles when the new LOS was released.

  • Forbes
    Forbes 9 दिन पहले +1

    3:20
    Oprah: Can you (at least) tell us what the question was ?!
    Harry: No I’m not going to share that… (you nosey little b*tch !!!)

  • Batman3217
    Batman3217 9 दिन पहले

    For once in Charles III Cheating Lifetime, I'm actually proud of him.

  • chicos mummy
    chicos mummy 9 दिन पहले +1

    Charles is the man to do it! If he decides this is the way it's to be then they can kiss the titles goodbye.

  • Rey Mominsky
    Rey Mominsky 9 दिन पहले

    Well Britons,you have a long complicated life ahead, " long live the king" 😂😂😂😂😂.

  • Margret Morris
    Margret Morris 9 दिन पहले +2

    Strip Harry and wife titles and I do believe the children’s parents are stated not wanting titles, what’s changed

  • Cathy Wickern
    Cathy Wickern 9 दिन पहले +3

    Good! Hazmeg left Royal life by choice. And they didn’t want titles. 🤷‍♀️

  • Sally Boyd
    Sally Boyd 9 दिन पहले

    Oh my goodness I do hope so 🤞

  • Dale Davis
    Dale Davis 9 दिन पहले +318

    U can't trash your family and not except repercussions. Hope these two realize that now.

    • Kay A
      Kay A 7 दिन पहले +2

      @Sophie Exactly!!! All these folks with their comments on Harry and Megan, I’d love to see how they respond if they were in a similar situation with their in-laws.

    • Dale Davis
      Dale Davis 8 दिन पहले

      @Alex Avery She didn't stay long enough to get mistreated. No, I don't think paying 30 million for your son's wedding is mistreating his wife.

    • Alex Avery
      Alex Avery 9 दिन पहले +2

      Can't insult a man's wife and expect him to take it on the chin. Family or not. If they cared about family they wouldn't have mistreated his wife.

    • Son NeverSets
      Son NeverSets 9 दिन पहले

      Don’t count on it.

  • Nidam R. Ramos
    Nidam R. Ramos 9 दिन पहले

    GOD bless Harry and Meghan 🙏

  • Rye Scott
    Rye Scott 9 दिन पहले

    I really hope he does! God save the king

  • LAUBAUU BAUU
    LAUBAUU BAUU 9 दिन पहले +3

    They choose to walk away from the royal platform, fight for title? What kind of logic is that???Coming back for mourning or scramble for concession??? What kind of kids are they???

  • Margaret Susan
    Margaret Susan 7 दिन पहले +1

    Harry feels a Royal title is a "trap" apparently so this should be a relief for him.

  • Mecrn90
    Mecrn90 9 दिन पहले +354

    None of them deserve titles . They don’t live there , wanted no parts of it and have no loyalty to the crown . They only want things they can monetize

    • Linda Patterson
      Linda Patterson 8 दिन पहले

      @Daniel Abebe Are you an American or a UK citizen ?

    • LoniLone Lony
      LoniLone Lony 9 दिन पहले +2

      @Alex Avery it is in Charles’s rights, as sovereign, to determine who is entitled to be a HRH Prince/Princess. I think it’s hilarious when people say “it’s their birthright” - or it’s “not their right to take it away” - it’s only “their birthright” because a Monarch issued a LP that stated as such. It is by definition his right. A Monarch grantith, a Monarch can takith away. Nothing is written in stone - it’s also a fact that he can strip H of his Prince title too! It’s been done in the past, so there is precedent. The dukedom is different, but it sounds like parliament is planning to remedy this.
      We all know Harry is writing a book about how his life was so hard because he was born a prince, and how it was such a burden on him, and how his wife saved him from being “trapped”. If he feels that way Charles should make sure his Children aren’t “burdened” as such.
      While I think Charles should change the letters patent now to exclude his children, and any children not born to future Monarchs, from holding such titles (streamlining the RF like others RF in Europe) - however letting it hang over their heads is truly their just deserts. They have wrecked havoc on the RF ever since she entered the picture, and spent the past two plus years lobbing attacks at every chance. They deserve every consequence of their actions, and they deserve to start worrying about if what they say (aka lie or embellish about) will bite them in the backside! F em’ the majority of people now have their number - their credibility is shot. I wouldn’t believe a word they spew any longer.
      It is hard to think of anything more disgusting than making a living off lying about your family and country. The only thing the disgusting pair deserve is to be spat at, lucky for them most people exhibit way more class than they are capable of.

    • LoniLone Lony
      LoniLone Lony 9 दिन पहले +1

      @Boom ds they serve “at the will of the people”. The “people” can choose to not have a monarchy when ever they like- full stop!

    • andrew tate
      andrew tate 9 दिन पहले

      Found footage: inclips.net/video/wLx_xnDFN6M/वीडियो.html,.

    • FeeFii Saifon
      FeeFii Saifon 9 दिन पहले +3

      To be fair, let do not forget about the birth of their children, they made it their way not by protocal and now they want all the righs following the proticals. This is selfish and it's all about money without responsibilities.

  • Gwen Jones
    Gwen Jones 7 दिन पहले +1

    Imagine King Tampon being upset about other's behavior, some nerve when you have no moral compass to begin with. Time to lose the monarchs

  • Charlie Davis
    Charlie Davis 9 दिन पहले +1

    Correct me if I'm wrong but my understanding is that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are supposed to represent the people of Sussex to the royal family. Since they gave that up to move to America who is representing those people and why should Harry and Meghan retain those titles? It seems to me that Charles should award those titles to someone who will represent Sussex. Harry and Meghan's children would then have no rights to any royal title. It just makes no sense to me that they or their children retain anything of royalty. And I say this without malice towards anyone just factual observation.

  • 27videoman
    27videoman 8 दिन पहले +1

    Remove the Duke and Duches of Sussex titles, also the Duke of York title. Also remove the
    right of these (Royals ) to wear uniforms in public!!!

  • Name
    Name 8 दिन पहले +8

    I feel so bad for them with parents like that

  • ellechim liag
    ellechim liag 9 दिन पहले +158

    They do not need the title since they are living in US and are most likely to stay and grow up there. US don't have royalties. So no. They don't need it. And didn't Megain proclaimed before that she doesn't want any titles and and that they want their kids to live normal lives? What makes it more normal than not having any title and just live as private citizens? And lets not even start with their claims about security because anyone who believes that is just dumb. Security doesn't automatically come with the title. Princesses Euginie and Beatrice are Princesses but they don't have security. So that argument is just for dumb people.. and why would the King give them title since they won't ever have any roles or chance of helping the monarchy? Their parents are not even working royals but instead they are constantly attacking the monarchy. Prince Edward's children doesn't have titles too even when the monarch was Queen Elizabeth. Not to mention Prince Edward and Sophie are loyal working Royals unlike the Harkles. Oh let's not forget that the Harkles sell the royal brand to the highest bidder as well. To give their children titles will only give them more to sell.
    So many many reasons why not to give them those titles. So I really hope the King will stand firm and not give in to their demands because the Harkles are like the terrorists. There is no negotiating with them. They will always want something more and forever blackmail the RF if they give in right now. Let them scream and claim racism. They will do that anyways no matter what.

    • Marianne S
      Marianne S 9 दिन पहले +2

      It’s ALL about status for the grifting narc MM

    • Xaveria Wara
      Xaveria Wara 9 दिन पहले +10

      Agreeeee

    • aser m
      aser m 9 दिन पहले

      inclips.net/video/g7PBxBMCxfg/वीडियो.html
      It's here finally!❤️

  • Rene Lim
    Rene Lim 9 दिन पहले +2

    Good for King Charles 👏👏👏

  • Janice M 🍁🍂
    Janice M 🍁🍂 9 दिन पहले +1

    One can only hope.
    None of them deserve it anyway.....I remember horrid and harpy not wanting to be royals when they left the UK.